1949 Alvis TB 14 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 333 more horse power than 1949 Alvis TB 14. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1949 Alvis TB 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alvis TB 14 weights approximately 23 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alvis TB 14 | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Alvis | Ford |
Model | TB 14 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1492 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2490 mm |