1949 Alvis TB 14 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1949 Alvis TB 14. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1949 Alvis TB 14.
Because 1949 Alvis TB 14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alvis TB 14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alvis TB 14 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Alvis | Holden |
Model | TB 14 | Epica |
Year Released | 1949 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |