1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley vs. 1957 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1957 Ford 12 M is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley would be higher. At 2,309 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley (75 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley weights approximately 530 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley | 1957 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Ford |
Model | Whitley | 12 M |
Year Released | 1949 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2500 mm |