1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 110 kg more than 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Chevrolet |
Model | Whitley | Camaro |
Year Released | 1949 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 5670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 468 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2570 mm |