1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley vs. 2006 Renault Clio

To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley would be higher. At 2,309 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley (75 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley weights approximately 275 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley 2006 Renault Clio
Make Armstrong Siddeley Renault
Model Whitley Clio
Year Released 1949 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2309 cc 1149 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 75 HP 74 HP
Torque 145 Nm 105 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 70 mm 69.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 76.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 6.5:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1430 kg 1155 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2930 mm 2580 mm