1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS

To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 205 kg more than 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley.

Compare all specifications:

1949 Armstrong Siddeley Whitley 2009 Cadillac BLS
Make Armstrong Siddeley Cadillac
Model Whitley BLS
Year Released 1949 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2309 cc 2792 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 75 HP 252 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 365 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 70 mm 89.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 74.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 6.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1430 kg 1635 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2930 mm 2680 mm