1949 Aston Martin 2-Litre vs. 2000 Ford Puma

To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Aston Martin 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Aston Martin 2-Litre would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Aston Martin 2-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1949 Aston Martin 2-Litre. (76 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1949 Aston Martin 2-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 155 kg more than 1949 Aston Martin 2-Litre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1949 Aston Martin 2-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Aston Martin 2-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1949 Aston Martin 2-Litre 2000 Ford Puma
Make Aston Martin Ford
Model 2-Litre Puma
Year Released 1949 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1970 cc 1679 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 76 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 7000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1120 kg 1275 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2450 mm