1949 Austin 16 vs. 1965 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1965 Cadillac Calais is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin 16 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1949 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 730 kg more than 1949 Austin 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Austin 16 | 1965 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | 16 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 95 L |
