1949 Austin 16 vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin 16 would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1949 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 390 kg more than 1949 Austin 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Austin 16 | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | 16 | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 6476 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 5420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3030 mm |
