1949 Austin 16 vs. 1966 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 1966 Lancia Fulvia is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Austin 16 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 1949 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Austin 16 | 1966 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Austin | Lancia |
Model | 16 | Fulvia |
Year Released | 1949 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 42 L |