1949 Austin 16 vs. 1972 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1972 Zastava 850 K is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Austin 16 (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Austin 16 should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Austin 16 weights approximately 425 kg more than 1972 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Austin 16 | 1972 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | 16 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2010 mm |
