1949 Austin 16 vs. 1994 Citroen XM

To start off, 1994 Citroen XM is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1949 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin 16.

Because 1949 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Citroen XM (168 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Austin 16. (147 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1994 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Austin 16.

Compare all specifications:

1949 Austin 16 1994 Citroen XM
Make Austin Citroen
Model 16 XM
Year Released 1949 1994
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2200 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 63 HP 115 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 147 Nm 168 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Top Speed 121 km/hour 188 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1280 kg 1280 kg
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 4720 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 66 L