1949 Austin 16 vs. 1996 Fiat Siena
To start off, 1996 Fiat Siena is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Siena weights approximately 20 kg more than 1949 Austin 16.
Because 1949 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Austin 16 | 1996 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | 16 | Siena |
Year Released | 1949 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1910 cc |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1300 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |