1949 Austin 16 vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1949 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin 16.
Because 1949 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Austin 16. (147 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Austin 16.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Austin 16 | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 16 | 5 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |