1949 Austin 16 vs. 2006 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Peugeot 207 (67 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1949 Austin 16. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin 16.
Because 1949 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Peugeot 207 (160 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Austin 16. (147 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Peugeot 207 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Austin 16.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Austin 16 | 2006 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Austin | Peugeot |
Model | 16 | 207 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1358 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |