1949 Austin 16 vs. 2010 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford S-Max is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford S-Max (160 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1949 Austin 16. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford S-Max should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin 16.
Because 1949 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford S-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford S-Max has automatic transmission and 1949 Austin 16 has manual transmission. 1949 Austin 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford S-Max will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Austin 16 | 2010 Ford S-Max | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 16 | S-Max |
Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |