1949 Austin 16 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu (187 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1949 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 280 kg more than 1949 Austin 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu (244 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Austin 16. (147 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Austin 16. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1949 Austin 16 has manual transmission. 1949 Austin 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Austin 16 | 2013 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | 16 | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 101 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1854 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1462 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2738 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |
