1949 Austin A 110 vs. 1946 Lancia Ardea 3
To start off, 1949 Austin A 110 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Austin A 110 (125 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Austin A 110 should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Austin A 110 weights approximately 1301 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Austin A 110 | 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | |
Make | Austin | Lancia |
Model | A 110 | Ardea 3 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 903 cc |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 28 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 6.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 674 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 29 L |