1949 Austin A 110 vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1960 Nissan Cedric is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Austin A 110 (125 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Austin A 110 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1949 Austin A 110 (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1949 Austin A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Austin A 110 | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 110 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1949 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 287 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2540 mm |