1949 Austin A 110 vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 1978 Mazda 616 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Austin A 110 (125 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Austin A 110 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Austin A 110 weights approximately 1063 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1949 Austin A 110 (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1949 Austin A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Austin A 110 | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 110 | 616 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 287 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2480 mm |