1949 Austin A 110 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Austin A 110 (125 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Austin A 110 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Austin A 110 weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1949 Austin A 110 (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1949 Austin A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Austin A 110 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | A 110 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 287 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2160 mm |
