1949 Austin A 110 vs. 1999 BMW Z9
To start off, 1999 BMW Z9 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 4,397 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW Z9 (242 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1949 Austin A 110. (125 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Austin A 110 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1999 BMW Z9.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Austin A 110. (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Austin A 110.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Austin A 110 | 1999 BMW Z9 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 110 | Z9 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 4397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 287 Nm | 560 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3060 mm |