1949 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 BMW 316
To start off, 1982 BMW 316 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,573 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 BMW 316 (89 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1949 Austin A 40. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Austin A 40 | 1982 BMW 316 | |
| Make | Austin | BMW |
| Model | A 40 | 316 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1573 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 55 L |
