1949 Austin A 40 vs. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron

To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1949 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 180 kg more than 1949 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1949 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1949 Austin A 40 1983 Cadillac Cimarron
Make Austin Cadillac
Model A 40 Cimarron
Year Released 1949 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1198 cc 2843 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 38 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 4300 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1150 kg
Vehicle Length 3890 mm 4530 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 2580 mm