1949 Austin A 40 vs. 1985 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1949 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Austin A 40. (80 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Austin A 40 | 1985 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 40 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1949 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2833 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2580 mm |