1949 Austin A 90 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1949 Austin A 90. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 766 kg more than 1949 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1949 Austin A 90 has manual transmission. 1949 Austin A 90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Austin A 90 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 90 | 62 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1359 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 79 L |