1949 Austin A 90 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1949 Austin A 90. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 671 kg more than 1949 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Austin A 90 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 90 | 62 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1359 kg | 2030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 75 L |