1949 Austin A 90 vs. 2005 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1949 Austin A 90. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1949 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 222 kg more than 1949 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Austin A 90. (190 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Austin A 90. 2005 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1949 Austin A 90 has manual transmission. 1949 Austin A 90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1949 Austin A 90 2005 Ford Falcon
Make Austin Ford
Model A 90 Falcon
Year Released 1949 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2660 cc 3984 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 87 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4900 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 357 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.4 mm 92.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 111.1 mm 99.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 7.5:1 9.6:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1359 kg 1581 kg
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2930 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 70 L