1949 BMW 340 vs. 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk
To start off, 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,042 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1949 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk should accelerate faster than 1949 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk weights approximately 106 kg more than 1949 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 BMW 340 | 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk | |
Make | BMW | Studebaker |
Model | 340 | Silver Hawk |
Year Released | 1949 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3042 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1356 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3070 mm |