1949 BMW 340 vs. 1976 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1976 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 BMW 340 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volkswagen Polo (55 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1949 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1949 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 BMW 340 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1976 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1949 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 BMW 340 | 1976 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | 340 | Polo |
Year Released | 1949 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2480 mm |