1949 BMW 340 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 BMW 340 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (58 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1949 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1949 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 BMW 340 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1949 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 BMW 340 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 340 | Clio |
Year Released | 1949 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |