1949 BMW 340 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,957 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1949 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1949 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 160 kg more than 1949 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 BMW 340 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | 340 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2957 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2480 mm |
