1949 BMW 340 vs. 2008 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,358 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1949 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1949 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 579 kg more than 1949 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 BMW 340 | 2008 Jeep Compass | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 340 | Compass |
Year Released | 1949 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1829 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2640 mm |