1949 Bristol 400 vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 400 would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 400. (79 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Bristol 400. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Bristol 400.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Bristol 400 | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 400 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1949 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2580 mm |