1949 Bristol 400 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 400 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 400. (79 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 400.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Bristol 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Bristol 400. (125 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Bristol 400.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Bristol 400 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | 400 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1949 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2380 mm |