1949 Bristol 401 vs. 1982 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 401. (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 401. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Bristol 401 weights approximately 139 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1949 Bristol 401 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Bristol 401. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Bristol 401 | 1982 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | Bristol | Buick |
Model | 401 | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 1949 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2580 mm |