1949 Bristol 401 vs. 2000 Holden GTS-R
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1949 Bristol 401 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Bristol 401. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 499 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Bristol 401. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Bristol 401.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Bristol 401 | 2000 Holden GTS-R | |
Make | Bristol | Holden |
Model | 401 | GTS-R |
Year Released | 1949 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 644 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |