1949 Bristol 401 vs. 2012 Honda CR-V

To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 401. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 401.

Because 1949 Bristol 401 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Bristol 401. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Bristol 401. (145 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Bristol 401. 2012 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1949 Bristol 401 has manual transmission. 1949 Bristol 401 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: