1949 Bristol 402 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1960 Toyota Master RR is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 402. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 402 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Bristol 402 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Bristol 402 (85 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Bristol 402 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Bristol 402 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Bristol 402 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Bristol | Toyota |
Model | 402 | Master RR |
Year Released | 1949 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 75 L |