1949 Bristol 402 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 402. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 402 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 402. (85 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 402. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 435 kg more than 1949 Bristol 402. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1949 Bristol 402 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Bristol 402. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Bristol 402. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Bristol 402.

Compare all specifications:

1949 Bristol 402 2005 Chevrolet Equinox
Make Bristol Chevrolet
Model 402 Equinox
Year Released 1949 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1971 cc 3425 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 85 HP 185 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 285 Nm
Engine Bore Size 66 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 96 mm 84 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 7.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1225 kg 1660 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4800 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 77 L 64 L