1949 Bristol 450 vs. 1955 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1955 Cadillac 62 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 450. (154 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1949 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Bristol 450 | 1955 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 450 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5424 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 267 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3290 mm |
