1949 Bristol 450 vs. 1968 Marcos 1600
To start off, 1968 Marcos 1600 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Bristol 450 (154 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1968 Marcos 1600. (88 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1968 Marcos 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Marcos 1600 weights approximately 32 kg more than 1949 Bristol 450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Bristol 450 | 1968 Marcos 1600 | |
| Make | Bristol | Marcos |
| Model | 450 | 1600 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 762 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1070 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |
