1949 Bristol 450 vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 478 kg more than 1949 Bristol 450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Bristol 450 | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 450 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1208 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |
