1949 Bristol 450 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Bristol 450 (154 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 478 kg more than 1949 Bristol 450.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Bristol 450 | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 450 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1208 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 82 L |
