1949 Bristol 450 vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 450. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 815 kg more than 1949 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Bristol 450 | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | 450 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 72 L |