1949 Bristol 450 vs. 2008 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 450. (154 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Mustang weights approximately 2132 kg more than 1949 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Bristol 450 | 2008 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 450 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 2862 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 61 L |
