1949 Bristol 450 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (320 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 450. (154 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1470 kg more than 1949 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Bristol 450 | 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 450 | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 98 L |