1949 Bristol 450 vs. 2010 Scion tC
To start off, 2010 Scion tC is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Scion tC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Scion tC (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 450. (154 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Scion tC weights approximately 588 kg more than 1949 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Bristol 450 | 2010 Scion tC | |
Make | Bristol | Scion |
Model | 450 | tC |
Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1318 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |