1949 Bristol 450 vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 450. (154 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1266 kg more than 1949 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Bristol 450 | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Bristol | Toyota |
Model | 450 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 87 L |