1949 Bristol 450 vs. 2011 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2011 Smart ForTwo is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Bristol 450 (154 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2011 Smart ForTwo. (70 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 2011 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 90 kg more than 1949 Bristol 450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Bristol 450 | 2011 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Bristol | Smart |
Model | 450 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1949 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 33 L |